Hydrocortisone

Evidence Level: L5 Predicted Indications: 10

Table of Contents

  1. Hydrocortisone
  2. Hydrocortisone: From Topical Anti-Itch/Eczema Use to Alopecia Areata
    1. One-Sentence Summary
    2. Quick Overview
    3. Why is This Prediction Reasonable?
    4. Clinical Trial Evidence
    5. Literature Evidence
    6. US Market Information
    7. Safety Considerations
    8. Conclusion and Next Steps
    9. Disclaimer

## Pharmacist Assessment Report

Hydrocortisone: From Topical Anti-Itch/Eczema Use to Alopecia Areata

One-Sentence Summary

Hydrocortisone is a glucocorticoid marketed in the US mainly as topical products (creams, lotions and others), including OTC products labelled for eczema and itch relief. The TxGNN model predicts it may be effective for alopecia areata, with 1 Phase 3 randomized trial (in which hydrocortisone was the comparator, not the test drug) and 21 publications retrieved, most of them old or indirect.

Quick Overview

Item Content
Original Indication Not stated in the license records (product names suggest eczema and itch relief)
Predicted New Indication Alopecia areata
TxGNN Prediction Score 99.97%
Evidence Level L2 (see note below)
US Market Status ✓ Marketed
Number of NDAs 20
Recommended Decision Hold

Evidence level note: the pack labels this L1, but under the stated rules L1 needs at least two completed Phase 3 RCTs. Only one exists here (NCT01453686), and hydrocortisone was its control arm, so it is graded L2 at most.

Why is This Prediction Reasonable?

Detailed mechanism-of-action data is not available in the pack. Based on known information, hydrocortisone is a glucocorticoid with anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects. Its efficacy in steroid-responsive skin conditions such as eczema is established, and mechanistically it may be applicable to alopecia areata.

Alopecia areata is a T-cell-mediated autoimmune attack on the hair follicle. Topical and intralesional corticosteroids are an established immunosuppressive approach for it, and this class effect is the basis of the prediction. Historical reports from 1956 to 1966 describe intradermal hydrocortisone injections for alopecia areata, which fits the idea.

The main caveat is potency. The only Phase 3 RCT used hydrocortisone 1% as the low-potency comparator against clobetasol 0.05%. It supports the steroid class effect but does not show that hydrocortisone is a preferred therapy, and the pack does not include the trial outcomes. Any real value would have to be shown against higher-potency steroids or JAK inhibitors.

Clinical Trial Evidence

Trial Number Phase Status Enrollment Key Findings
NCT01453686 Phase 3 Completed 41 Clobetasol 0.05% cream vs hydrocortisone 1% cream in children with alopecia areata. Hydrocortisone is the comparator arm; results are not in the pack.
NCT00484679 Phase 2 Completed 18 Intralesional triamcinolone and adrenal function in alopecia areata. Hydrocortisone is probably relevant only to adrenal axis assessment.
NCT06551818 N/A Not yet recruiting 72 Four-arm, placebo-controlled hair growth product study in androgenic alopecia. The role of hydrocortisone is unclear.
NCT04343560 N/A Completed 380 Steroid metabolome and bone quality in mild autonomous cortisol secretion. Not related to alopecia areata treatment.

Only the first trial is direct evidence, and hydrocortisone was its control rather than the test agent.

Literature Evidence

PMID Year Type Journal Key Findings
24226568 2014 RCT JAMA Dermatol Clobetasol 0.05% vs hydrocortisone 1% in children with alopecia areata (publication of NCT01453686).
38501938 2024 Retrospective clinical study Clin Exp Dermatol Topical corticosteroid under occlusion for severe alopecia areata in children. Class-level evidence, not hydrocortisone-specific.
36718837 2023 Systematic review/meta-analysis J Cosmet Dermatol Fractional laser alone or combined in alopecia areata. Indirect; not about hydrocortisone.
15692503 2005 Case report J Am Acad Dermatol Four cases of congenital alopecia areata treated with minoxidil and a range of topical agents.
28516731 2017 Review J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol Whether the HPA axis is hyperactive in alopecia areata; background on cortisol and stress.
13368875 1956 Historical clinical report Medical Times Treatment of alopecia areata, partialis and totalis with cortisone, hydrocortisone, prednisone and prednisolone.
13610145 1958 Historical report Der Hautarzt Hair growth in alopecia areata after intracutaneous hydrocortisone injection (title only; no abstract).
14158891 1963 Historical report Actas Dermosifiliogr Intradermal hydrocortisone injections for alopecia areata (title only; no abstract).
5989830 1966 Historical report Vestn Dermatol Venerol Intracutaneous hydrocortisone injections in alopecia areata and total alopecia (title only; no abstract).
28094416 2017 Veterinary case report Tierarztl Prax K German shepherd dog with alopecia areata; topical tacrolimus and hydrocortisone aceponate were ineffective.

The only modern RCT compares two steroid potencies. The hydrocortisone-specific reports are 1950s–60s papers without abstracts in the pack.

US Market Information

Authorization Number Product Name Dosage Form Approved Indication
ANDA089074 hydrocortisone (Bryant Ranch Prepack) Lotion Not stated in record
part348 Intensive Healing Eczema (Walgreens) Lotion Not stated in record
M017 Hydrocortisone (Safetec of America) Cream Not stated in record
M017 WINCO Hydrocortisone (WinCo Foods) Cream Not stated in record
M017 Family Care Anti-Itch (United Exchange Corp.) Cream Not stated in record

There are 20 authorizations in total. Other dosage forms on the market are oral tablets, solution, spray and ointment.

Safety Considerations

Please refer to the package insert for safety information.

Conclusion and Next Steps

Decision: Hold

Rationale: The only Phase 3 RCT used hydrocortisone 1% as the low-potency control, so it supports the steroid class effect but not hydrocortisone itself, and no outcomes are available. Higher-potency steroids and JAK inhibitors are the more likely comparators. The other nine predicted indications are L4–L5, and none has clinical evidence supporting hydrocortisone.

To proceed, the following is needed:

  • Trial outcomes for NCT01453686 and the JAMA Dermatology 2014 paper, to see how hydrocortisone 1% performed against clobetasol
  • Package insert warnings and contraindications (a blocking gap for safety screening)
  • Detailed mechanism-of-action data from DrugBank
  • Approved indication text for the US licenses, to confirm the original indication
  • Comparative evidence against higher-potency topical steroids and JAK inhibitors, to show any added value
  • Route and formulation assessment (topical vs intralesional) for scalp use

    Disclaimer

This content is for research purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Clinical validation is required before any clinical application.



Copyright © 2026 藥提醒科技有限公司 (yao.care). For research purposes only.

This site uses Just the Docs, a documentation theme for Jekyll.