Insulin Aspart

證據等級: L5 預測適應症: 10

目錄

  1. Insulin Aspart
  2. Insulin Aspart: From Diabetes Mellitus to Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
    1. One-Sentence Summary
    2. Quick Overview
    3. Why is This Prediction Reasonable?
    4. Clinical Trial Evidence
    5. Literature Evidence
    6. Safety Considerations
    7. Conclusion and Next Steps
    8. Disclaimer

## 藥師評估報告

Insulin Aspart: From Diabetes Mellitus to Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

One-Sentence Summary

Insulin aspart (DrugBank DB01306) is a rapid-acting insulin analog used for glycemic control in diabetes mellitus. The TxGNN model predicts it may be effective for Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, supported by 10+ clinical trials and 20 publications currently on record. Note: the evidence pack itself flags this as likely not a true “old drug, new use” case — type 1 diabetes is almost certainly already a standard approved indication for insulin aspart; the original_indications field is empty due to a data gap (DG002), so this should be confirmed against the actual product label rather than treated as a novel repurposing signal.


Quick Overview

Item Content
Original Indication Not recorded in evidence pack (data gap, DG002) — literature evidence indicates insulin aspart is a rapid-acting insulin analog already used for glycemic control in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus
Predicted New Indication Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
TxGNN Prediction Score 99.95%
Evidence Level L1
Taiwan (TFDA) Market Status 未上市 (Not Marketed)
Number of TFDA Licenses 0
Recommended Decision Proceed with Guardrails

Why is This Prediction Reasonable?

Currently, detailed mechanism of action data is not available (DG002, High severity data gap). Based on known information, insulin aspart is a rapid-acting insulin analog; its efficacy in glycemic control for diabetes mellitus has been proven, and mechanistically it directly binds the insulin receptor to promote peripheral glucose utilization.

Type 1 diabetes mellitus is a disease of absolute insulin deficiency due to autoimmune β-cell destruction. Physiologic insulin replacement — including rapid-acting analogs like aspart used as prandial/bolus insulin in basal-bolus regimens — is the established standard of care for this condition. The mechanistic link is therefore direct and non-speculative, not an indirect or exploratory repurposing hypothesis.

However, this reframes the nature of the “prediction”: since original_indications is empty in this evidence pack, it is unclear whether type 1 diabetes is already an approved indication for this product elsewhere. Given that virtually all commercial insulin aspart products (e.g., NovoRapid/NovoLog) are already indicated for type 1 diabetes, this candidate likely represents a data-completeness gap rather than a genuine new-indication opportunity, and should be verified against the actual product label before being treated as a repurposing case.


Clinical Trial Evidence

Trial Number Phase Status Enrollment Key Findings
NCT01992588 Phase 1 Completed 48 PK/PD comparison of FIAsp (faster-acting insulin aspart) vs. insulin aspart as CSII bolus in T1DM
NCT01697657 Phase 3 Completed 131 Multinational crossover RCT: insulin detemir+aspart vs. NPH+aspart on hypoglycemia frequency in T1DM basal-bolus regimen
NCT03143816 Phase 4 Completed 60 Real-life pilot comparing prandial insulin aspart vs. Technosphere inhaled insulin in T1DM
NCT00542399 Phase 4 Completed 50 Once- vs. twice-daily insulin detemir with Novorapid (aspart) as mealtime insulin in pediatric T1DM
NCT01774565 NA Completed 43 Closed-loop glucose control comparing faster insulin aspart vs. standard insulin aspart
NCT07068295 Phase 1 Completed 65 PK/PD/safety of a novel fast-acting insulin vs. insulin aspart via insulin pump
NCT01194258 Phase 2 Completed 132 Double-blind crossover: Lispro-PH20/Aspart-PH20 vs. insulin lispro for prandial control
NCT05653050 NA Completed 26 Closed-loop glucose control with ultra-rapid insulin vs. standard pump therapy in adolescents with T1DM
NCT03959514 Phase 1 Completed 18 Glucose clamp PK/PD/safety comparison of AT247 vs. NovoRapid® vs. Fiasp® in T1DM
NCT00097071 Phase 3 Completed 299 Safety and efficacy of insulin aspart (NovoLog®) vs. insulin lispro via CSII in children/adolescents with T1DM

Literature Evidence

PMID Year Type Journal Key Findings
37863084 2023 RCT (Phase 3a) Lancet ONWARDS 6: once-weekly insulin icodec vs. once-daily degludec, both as part of a basal-bolus (aspart) regimen, in T1DM
36623517 2023 RCT Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol EXPECT trial: degludec vs. detemir, both combined with insulin aspart, in pregnant women with T1DM
21333580 2011 RCT/Systematic Review Diabetes & Metabolism Efficacy and safety of rapid-acting insulin aspart vs. regular human insulin in T1DM/T2DM
18710361 2008 RCT Expert Opin Pharmacother Biphasic insulin aspart 30 for treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus
40129237 2025 RCT (crossover) Diabetes Obes Metab Faster-acting insulin aspart vs. insulin aspart in T1DM with non-automated pump + CGM
37804858 2023 RCT Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol CopenFast: faster aspart vs. insulin aspart in T1DM/T2DM during pregnancy and post-delivery
37404205 2023 RCT (double-blind crossover) Diabetes Technol Ther Faster vs. standard insulin aspart with hybrid automated insulin delivery in youth with T1DM
41697686 2026 Review JAMA Type 1 Diabetes: A Review — disease overview and insulin-based management
15871555 2003 Review Treatments in Endocrinology Spotlight on insulin aspart in type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus
12215068 2002 Review Drugs Insulin aspart: a review of its use in the management of type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus

Safety Considerations

Please refer to the package insert for safety information. (No key warnings, contraindications, or DDI data are currently on record for this candidate — TFDA label data is a Blocking data gap, DG001.)


Conclusion and Next Steps

Decision: Proceed with Guardrails

Rationale: Clinical and literature evidence for insulin aspart in type 1 diabetes is extensive and meets L1 evidence criteria (multiple completed Phase 3 RCTs, e.g., NCT01697657, NCT00097071). However, the product is not currently marketed in Taiwan (0 TFDA licenses), TFDA label safety data is a Blocking gap (DG001), and MOA/original-indication data are missing (DG002) — so this cannot be treated as a confirmed novel repurposing case without further verification.

To proceed, the following is needed:

  • TFDA-approved package insert (warnings, contraindications, DDI) — Blocking gap, must resolve before any safety review (DG001)
  • DrugBank-sourced MOA confirmation (DG002)
  • Confirmation of the drug’s actual approved original indication(s), to determine whether “Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus” is a genuine new indication or already standard labeling elsewhere
  • Regulatory pathway assessment for Taiwan market entry (currently 未上市, 0 licenses)

    Disclaimer

This content is for research purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Clinical validation is required before any clinical application.



Copyright © 2026 藥提醒科技有限公司 (yao.care). For research purposes only.

This site uses Just the Docs, a documentation theme for Jekyll.