Insulin Aspart

Evidence Level: L5 Predicted Indications: 10

Table of Contents

  1. Insulin Aspart
  2. Insulin Aspart: From Diabetes Mellitus to Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
    1. One-Sentence Summary
    2. Quick Overview
    3. Why is This Prediction Reasonable?
    4. Clinical Trial Evidence
    5. Literature Evidence
    6. US Market Information
    7. Safety Considerations
    8. Conclusion and Next Steps
    9. Disclaimer

## Pharmacist Assessment Report

Insulin Aspart: From Diabetes Mellitus to Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

One-Sentence Summary

Insulin aspart is a rapid-acting insulin analog used for mealtime glycemic control in diabetes. The TxGNN model predicts it for type 1 diabetes mellitus, with 43 clinical trials and 19 publications retrieved in this direction. This is closer to confirmation of standard care than true repurposing: the pack has no label text for the original indication, so that use is taken from general knowledge, not from the pack.

Quick Overview

Item Content
Predicted New Indication Type 1 diabetes mellitus
TxGNN Prediction Score 99.95%
Evidence Level L1 (multiple completed Phase 3 trials, though some are only partly aspart-specific)
US Market Status ✓ Marketed
Number of NDAs 20 licenses (listed authorizations are BLAs)
Recommended Decision Proceed with Guardrails

Why is This Prediction Reasonable?

Detailed mechanism of action data is not currently available in the pack. Insulin aspart is a rapid-acting insulin analog. In type 1 diabetes, autoimmune destruction of pancreatic beta cells causes insulin deficiency. Injected aspart replaces the missing mealtime insulin, so the mechanistic link is direct.

The prediction therefore mostly reflects an established use, not a new one. The pack’s original_indications field is empty and its MOA is a data gap. This should be fixed before release.

The evidence is also uneven in how specific it is to aspart:

  • Strongest aspart-specific evidence: the Phase 3 trials of aspart in insulin pumps (NCT00097071, NCT01109316), the Phase 4 head-to-head trial against inhaled insulin (NCT03143816), and the Phase 1 PK/PD study of faster aspart (NCT01992588).
  • Weaker evidence: several trials have truncated titles, so aspart’s role in them (bolus background versus study drug) cannot be confirmed from the input.

Clinical Trial Evidence

The pack lists 43 trials. The 10 most relevant are shown below. Summaries come from the registry text, and the pack contains no efficacy results for these trials.

Trial Number Phase Status Enrollment Key Findings
NCT00097071 Phase 3 Completed 299 Safety and efficacy of insulin aspart vs insulin lispro in insulin pumps in children and adolescents with T1DM
NCT01109316 Phase 3 Completed 132 Crossover study of insulin lispro vs insulin aspart in pump reservoirs in T1DM
NCT01697657 Phase 3 Completed 131 Detemir + aspart vs NPH + aspart, comparing hypoglycemia frequency in T1DM (aspart as bolus)
NCT03143816 Phase 4 Completed 60 Prandial insulin aspart vs Technosphere inhaled insulin in T1DM on multiple daily injections
NCT01992588 Phase 1 Completed 48 PK/PD of faster-acting insulin aspart (FIAsp) vs insulin aspart as a bolus in T1DM pump users
NCT03436498 Phase 1 Completed 45 Pump safety (infusion set occlusions) of SAR341402 vs NovoLog in adults with T1DM
NCT01464099 Phase 1 Completed 24 Bioequivalence of NovoLog 100 U/mL vs 200 U/mL formulations in T1DM
NCT04759144 N/A Completed 27 Hybrid closed-loop with faster aspart vs standard aspart in young children with T1DM
NCT03579615 N/A Completed 18 Closed-loop control with faster-acting aspart vs aspart in adults with T1DM
NCT00322257 Phase 3 Terminated 596 Inhaled mealtime insulin (AERx) vs subcutaneous aspart, both with detemir, in T1DM

Literature Evidence

The pack lists 19 publications. The 10 most relevant are shown below, with RCTs first. Where only the abstract objective is available, that is what is summarized.

PMID Year Type Journal Key Findings
40129237 2025 RCT Diabetes Obes Metab Double-blind crossover of faster aspart vs aspart in adults with T1D on non-automated pump plus CGM
37404205 2023 RCT Diabetes Technol Ther Faster vs standard aspart with hybrid automated insulin delivery in 30 active youths with T1D
37804858 2023 RCT Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol CopenFast: faster aspart vs aspart on fetal growth in pregnancy and post-delivery (T1D or T2D)
36623517 2023 RCT Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol EXPECT: degludec vs detemir, both with aspart, in pregnant women with T1D
36633505 2023 RCT Diabetes Obes Metab Pramlintide/insulin A21G co-formulation (ADO09) improved postprandial glucose and time in range vs aspart in T1D
37863084 2023 RCT Lancet ONWARDS 6: icodec vs degludec in a basal-bolus regimen in T1D (indirect for aspart)
21333580 2011 Systematic review Diabetes Metab Efficacy and safety of insulin aspart vs regular human insulin in T1DM and T2DM
35746893 2023 Meta-analysis Diabetes Metab J Fast-acting aspart vs aspart in insulin pumps for T1DM
12215068 2002 Review Drugs Review of insulin aspart in T1DM and T2DM: lower HbA1c than regular insulin when given immediately before meals
41697686 2026 Review JAMA General review of type 1 diabetes (not aspart-specific)

US Market Information

The pack lists 20 licenses in total. Four distinct main authorizations are shown. Approved-indication text is not available in the pack.

Authorization Number Product Name Dosage Form Manufacturer
BLA020986 NOVOLOG Injection, solution A-S Medication Solutions
BLA020986 Insulin Aspart Injection, solution REMEDYREPACK INC.
BLA761325 MERILOG Injection, solution Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC
BLA021172 Insulin Aspart Protamine and Insulin Aspart Injection, suspension REMEDYREPACK INC.

Safety Considerations

  • Injection-site reactions: Localized lipodystrophy at injection sites is a known adverse effect of injected insulin. It appears among the model’s predicted associations (drug-induced localized lipodystrophy) and is more likely a safety signal than a therapeutic use.

Please refer to the package insert for other safety information.

Conclusion and Next Steps

Decision: Proceed with Guardrails

Rationale: Completed Phase 3 and Phase 4 trials, plus RCTs and systematic reviews, support aspart in T1DM, and the mechanism is direct insulin replacement. However, this is an established use, not new repurposing. Safety data are missing, and several trials cannot be confirmed as aspart-specific.

To proceed, the following is needed:

  • Package insert warnings and contraindications (flagged as a blocking gap, DG001)
  • Mechanism of action data from DrugBank (DG002)
  • Original indication label text
  • Confirmation of aspart’s role in trials with truncated titles (e.g., NCT01697657)
  • Reclassification of this candidate as standard-care confirmation in the pack

Other predictions in the pack:

  • Permanent neonatal diabetes mellitus has the only other supporting evidence (L4). It rests on a single non-aspart-specific review, and some genetic subtypes respond to sulfonylureas, so it is a research question.
  • The remaining eight predictions are L5 with no trials or literature. They should be held, and drug-induced localized lipodystrophy should be reclassified as an adverse-effect link.

    Disclaimer

This content is for research purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Clinical validation is required before any clinical application.



Copyright © 2026 藥提醒科技有限公司 (yao.care). For research purposes only.

This site uses Just the Docs, a documentation theme for Jekyll.