Valsartan

Evidence Level: L4 Predicted Indications: 7

Table of Contents

  1. Valsartan
    1. Pharmacist Assessment Report
  2. Valsartan: From Hypertension to Malignant Renovascular Hypertension
    1. One-Sentence Summary
    2. Quick Overview
    3. Why is This Prediction Reasonable?
    4. Clinical Trial Evidence
    5. Literature Evidence
    6. US Market Information
    7. Safety Considerations
    8. Conclusion and Next Steps
    9. Disclaimer

Pharmacist Assessment Report

Valsartan: From Hypertension to Malignant Renovascular Hypertension

One-Sentence Summary

Valsartan is an angiotensin II receptor blocker originally used to treat hypertension. The TxGNN model predicts it may be effective for malignant renovascular hypertension, but there are 0 clinical trials and only 1 publication (a preclinical animal study) supporting this direction.

Quick Overview

Item Content
Original Indication Hypertensive disorder / hypertension
Predicted New Indication Malignant renovascular hypertension
TxGNN Prediction Score 99.97%
Evidence Level L4
US Market Status Cancelled only (all licenses cancelled)
Number of NDAs 12 (1 NDA and 11 ANDAs, all cancelled)
Recommended Decision Hold

Why is This Prediction Reasonable?

Currently, detailed mechanism of action data is not available in the data compiled for this report. Based on known information, valsartan is an angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor blocker. Its efficacy in hypertension is established, and mechanistically it may be applicable to malignant renovascular hypertension, in which the renin-angiotensin system plays a central role.

The predicted indication is very close to the approved one. Malignant renovascular hypertension is a severe, renin-driven form of hypertension. The one supporting paper (PMID 11560862, 2001) reports that AT1 receptor blockade prevented lethal malignant hypertension in an animal model, partly independent of blood pressure lowering. This evidence is indirect, because the study was not specific to valsartan and was not conducted in humans. Because the indication is so close to hypertension, it offers little repurposing novelty.

Other predictions in the same list are weaker. Malignant hypertensive renal disease has only an avosentan paper (a different drug). The pulmonary hypertension predictions rest mostly on animal and cell studies, or on sacubitril/valsartan, a combination product. Braddock syndrome and pulmonary hypertension with unclear multifactorial mechanism have no supporting evidence beyond the model score.

Clinical Trial Evidence

Currently no related clinical trials are registered for the lead predicted indication, malignant renovascular hypertension.

For the sixth-ranked prediction, chronic pulmonary heart disease, one trial matched, but it is not relevant:

Trial Number Phase Status Enrollment Key Findings
NCT02966665 Phase 1 Recruiting 420 Exercise rehabilitation and vascular function in hypertension; does not test valsartan for this indication

Literature Evidence

PMID Year Type Journal Key Findings
11560862 2001 Preclinical (animal) Circulation AT1 receptor blockade prevented lethal malignant hypertension, related to reduced kidney inflammation

Literature for other predicted indications is mostly indirect (examples):

PMID Year Type Journal Key Findings
24368192 2014 Preclinical (avosentan, a different drug) Pharmacological Research Endothelin antagonist protective in hypertensive nephropathy (malignant hypertensive renal disease)
32552157 2020 Preclinical (animal) J Am Heart Assoc Sacubitril/valsartan attenuated right ventricular remodeling in pulmonary hypertension
22377232 2012 Preclinical (animal) Diabetes Res Clin Pract Valsartan inhibited the HIF-1α pathway and reduced renal fibrosis in diabetic rats
39210725 2024 Post hoc analysis of RCTs JAMA Cardiology Sacubitril/valsartan and all-cause hospitalizations in heart failure (not cor pulmonale)

US Market Information

All 12 US authorizations are listed as cancelled, and none carries approved indication text in the data compiled for this report. Five examples:

Authorization Number Product Name Dosage Form Approved Indication
NDA021283 Diovan (Novartis) Tablet Not available
ANDA203311 Valsartan (Proficient Rx) Film-coated tablet Not available
ANDA204821 Valsartan (A-S Medication Solutions) Tablet Not available
ANDA214102 Valsartan (ANI Pharmaceuticals) Solution Not available
ANDA090866 Valsartan (Mylan) Film-coated tablet Not available

Safety Considerations

Package insert warnings and contraindications were not available in the data compiled for this report. Please refer to the package insert for safety information.

  • Knowledge-graph contraindication signals (not label text): liver failure, liver disease, pancreatitis, gallbladder disease, angioedema (including hereditary and ACE/RAAS-blocker-induced forms), systemic lupus erythematosus, diabetes mellitus and diabetic ketoacidosis, neutropenia/agranulocytosis, hypotensive disorder, anuria, impaired renal function, renal artery obstruction, gout, hyperparathyroidism, hypercalcemia, and potassium deficiency. These come from a network database and must be confirmed against the label.
  • Drug Interactions (100 recorded; examples):
    • Major: potassium chloride and potassium bicarbonate (risk of hyperkalemia).
    • Moderate: hydrocortisone, eluxadoline, exenatide, polyethylene glycol with electrolytes, and many insulin products.

Conclusion and Next Steps

Decision: Hold

Rationale: The prediction score is high (99.97%), but the evidence is only one preclinical animal paper and no clinical trials (Evidence Level L4). The new indication is also nearly identical to the original hypertension indication, so it adds little novelty. All US licenses are cancelled, and safety label data is missing.

To proceed, the following is needed:

  • The FDA package insert (warnings and contraindications), which is a blocking gap for safety screening
  • Detailed mechanism of action data from DrugBank
  • Clinical data specific to valsartan in malignant or renovascular hypertension
  • Clarification of why all US licenses are marked cancelled, and of the current market status
  • A decision on whether this near-duplicate indication is worth pursuing, or whether to prioritize a more distinct candidate

    Disclaimer

This content is for research purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Clinical validation is required before any clinical application.



Copyright © 2026 藥提醒科技有限公司 (yao.care). For research purposes only.

This site uses Just the Docs, a documentation theme for Jekyll.